WATCH: Adam Schiff Says He Does NOT Regret Giving Credibility To Steele Dossier Even Though It’s Been Thoroughly Debunked
On Sunday, MSNBC’s Chuck Todd criticized Adam Schiff for the credibility he gave to the Steele Dossier in the past four years.
At the beginning of this year, the far-left Washington Post ate crow. They went so far that they can no longer stand by the accuracy.
Join Our Telegram channel here: https://t.me/TheTrueReporter
Todd shared old clips of Schiff praising Dossier before even asking him if he regrets something.
“As chair of the House intelligence committee, do you regret giving credibility to the Steele dossier before anybody had been able to verify anything in that. A lot of those clips were done before there was any good verification. Look, some news organizations made the mistake of publishing this Dossier without verifying it. That is a separate conversation for those news organizations. But you helped give it credibility. Do you regret it?” Todd asked.
“I don’t regret saying that we should investigate claims of someone who was a respected British intelligence officer,” Schiff replied, completely dodging the question.
Watch this:
CHUCK TODD: "Do you regret giving credibility to the Steele dossier?"
ADAM SCHIFF: "I don't" pic.twitter.com/FdCZCoQ4Gq
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 14, 2021
We previously have mentioned that the WaPo had to walk back some of the bogus reporting about the Dossier.
Their latest update says they have “corrected and removed parts of two stories.”
The change comes after the revelations that appeared about Dossier. Some of them were debunked and originated from political insiders very close to Clinton.
“The Washington Post on Friday took the unusual step of correcting and removing large portions of two articles, published in March 2017 and February 2019, that had identified a Belarusian American businessman as a key source of the ‘Steele dossier,’ a collection of largely unverified reports that claimed the Russian government had compromising information about then-candidate Donald Trump,” they write.
“The newspaper’s executive editor, Sally Buzbee, said The Post could no longer stand by the accuracy of those elements of the story. It had identified businessman Sergei Millian as ‘Source D,’ the unnamed figure who passed on the most salacious allegation in the Dossier to its principal author, former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele,” they add.
The Washington Post is supported by the elite media and big money, so there is no reckoning.
Americans have to know that outlets similar to the Washington Post will lie and cheat.
Join Our Telegram channel here: https://t.me/TheTrueReporter
Source: trendingpolitics.com
