POLITICSUS

Pelosi Is Exposed! House Sergeant At Arms Is Guilty For Covering For Pelosi On Capitol Riots Security Failure 

Nancy Pelosi explained the fallout of the Capitol riot on January 6. She suggested a 9/11- style commission. It should be led by a partisan general to see what happened on the terrible event. 

Join Our Telegram channel here: https://t.me/TheTrueReporter

The decision was made when high-ranking Republicans served Pelosi’s notice. There she needed to answer some serious questions related to the event. 

Some of the questions she needs to answer are: 

  1. What did she know about the planned attack on Capitol Hill? 
  2. Why security requests from Steven Sund were rejected by the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms even six times????
  3. Why the security at Capitol Hill was so woeful, and the officer held the doors open for the protestors? 

Currently, people accuse Pelosi of weakening the security before the Capitol riot due to “optics.” 

The Daily Caller cited numerous anonymous sources that the former House Sergeant at Arms protected Pelosi and is “covering for her.”

Below we provide you the text that the Daily Caller shared: 

”The New York Times previously reported that the Speaker’s office confirmed that the National Guard was approved around 1:43 pm. According to CNN, Sund said he sent a request for help from the National Guard to Irving around 1:09 pm. Irving said he was contacted about the matter after 2:00 pm, Axios reported. Sources questioned how Irving got the request after 2 pm, but Pelosi approved the request at 1:43 pm.

“If you believe Irving’s timeline that he testified under oath to, how could he ask for permission from the Speaker 20 minutes before he got the request? “Also, if you believe his sworn testimony that he never had to run the request up the chain, why did the Speaker’s office confirm he did just that?”

Another source to this answered that Irving helps Pelosi to cover her traces. 

At this point, the Daily Caller cannot reveal its sources. They explained why they are hiding them right now.

The DC has three anonymous sources, and all of them confirmed the previously sad statement. If it is true, this discussion makes us question the Pelosi office’s obligations and responsibility for the security failures. The Capitol security failure resulted in Irving and Steven Sund’s resignation! 

The National Pulse stated there was a delay getting approval, but that is not everything! The National Guard took hours to get to the crime scene because they were on standby.

Below we provide you with their statement: 

“At 1:09 pm, still before the President had finished speaking, Sund called the Sergeants-at-arms of the House and Senate. He told them it was time to call in the National Guard. He even said he wanted an emergency declaration. Both, however, said they would “run it up the chain” and get back to him.

At 1:50 pm, the Capitol itself was breached. Still, before most Trump speeches, attendees could have arrived.

What happened after this point was a back and forth over hours between D.C. officials, Army officials, and Capitol police.

Eventually – at past 5 pm – the National Guard arrived.”

We need to bear in mind, all those questions that Pelosi needs to answer to are for the days before the riot!

In front of the Congress, Steven Sund told six times that there was a high risk of high violence a couple of days before the riot! 

Pelosi forced Sund to resign! But after his resignation, he wrote a letter where he shared the crucial mistakes!

“Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the ‘optics’ of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence,”

Also, Sund required an additional National Guard, but they turned them down!

“Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said he requested that the National Guard be placed on standby in the days before the deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol, but House and Senate security officials turned him down,”

The risk of a riot on Election Day was announced even last March! 

We can see from a Time piece that there were radical groups, powerful cooperation, and labor unions to “fortify” the U.S. election, so they won’t allow Trump to win. 

Concrete intelligence from December suggested foreign influence in the plans for the Capitol Building assault. 

Many people can conclude that everything was alluding to the riot on January 6.

Pelosi should give her opinion regarding Trump’s supporters and their violence in the middle of November. She said: 

”Pelosi responded that the words of the President of the United States “weigh a ton,” and while President Trump did not create the problem of (right-wing) violence, “I think he fans the flames.”

And people hear things in a way that could encourage some unfortunate situations, as they have done in the State of Michigan.”

Even though Pelosi was paranoiac regarding the Trump supporter’s violence, she blamed them without security before the planned attack on Capitol Hill.  

Join Our Telegram channel here: https://t.me/TheTrueReporter

Source:

trendingpolitics.com

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker